From ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu Thu Oct 7 18:59:30 1993 Received: from tipper.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA15577; Thu, 7 Oct 93 18:59:30 EDT Received: from localhost.oit.unc.edu by tipper.oit.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA10766; Thu, 7 Oct 93 18:59:30 EDT Message-Id: <9310072259.AA10766@tipper.oit.unc.edu> To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Subject: Checking on the return path Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 07 Oct 93 18:59:29 -0400 From: Simon E Spero The return patch should be fixed, and the "not subscribed messages" gone for good. Simon From boris@netmanage.com Thu Oct 7 20:28:30 1993 Received: from relay1.UU.NET by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA21143; Thu, 7 Oct 93 20:28:30 EDT Received: from netmanage.com (via netman-gate.netmanage.com) by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA14680; Thu, 7 Oct 93 20:28:24 -0400 Received: from boris2 (boris2.netmanage.com) by netmanage.com (4.1/NetManage-1.0) id AA16287; Thu, 7 Oct 93 17:23:18 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Oct 93 19:00:17 EDT From: Boris Yanovsky Subject: RE: Checking on the return path To: Multiple recipients of list , ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu X-Mailer: Chameleon - TCP/IP for Windows by NetManage, Inc. Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >The return patch should be fixed, and the "not subscribed messages" gone >for good. > >Simon > Does this mean I don't have to be dirrectly subscribed to the list in order to reply to the list? If so this would definitely be great. ***************************************************** Home of Chameleon TCP/IP for Windows Boris Yanovsky Phone: (408) 973-7171 NetManage Inc. Fax: (408) 257-6405 20823 Stevens Creek Blvd. Internet: boris@netmanage.com Cupertino, California, U.S.A. ***************************************************** From backman@teflon.ftp.com Fri Oct 8 05:37:44 1993 Received: from ftp.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA14432; Fri, 8 Oct 93 05:37:44 EDT Received: from teflon.ftp.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA19777; Fri, 8 Oct 93 05:20:26 -0400 Received: from backman.homerun by teflon.ftp.com.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA17303; Fri, 8 Oct 93 05:20:14 EDT Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 05:20:14 EDT Message-Id: <9310080920.AA17303@teflon.ftp.com.ftp.com> To: boris@netmanage.com Subject: RE: Checking on the return path From: backman@teflon.ftp.com (Larry Backman) Cc: Multiple recipients of list Sender: backman@teflon.ftp.com Repository: teflon.ftp.com Originating-Client: homerun Content-Length: 410 >> Does this mean I don't have to be dirrectly subscribed to the list in order >> to reply to the list? If so this would definitely be great. >> and another original member of the list chimes in with a loud agreement. I have a mailbox full of bounced winsock mail that I gave up on. At this point it would probably be unwise to revisit re:blocking hook, re: error condition,etc. & friends :-) Larry From James=L.=Weaver@nectech.com Fri Oct 8 06:21:37 1993 Received: from nectech.com (milkyway.nectech.com) by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA15983; Fri, 8 Oct 93 06:21:37 EDT Received: from CS011.nectech.com by nectech.com with SMTP (5.65/29-nectech) id AA28436; Fri, 8 Oct 93 06:06:13 -0400 Return-Path: Message-Id: <9310081006.AA28436@nectech.com> Received: by CS011.nectech.com with VINES ; Fri, 8 Oct 93 06:19:53 EDT Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 06:19:46 EDT From: James=L.=Weaver@nectech.com Subject: RE: Checking on the return path To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Cc: I am on vacation until 10/18. Please contact Dick Dingler in an emergency. ------------- Original Text >From backman@teflon.ftp.com (Larry Backman), on 10-08-93 6:13: >> Does this mean I don't have to be dirrectly subscribed to the list in order >> to reply to the list? If so this would definitely be great. >> and another original member of the list chimes in with a loud agreement. I have a mailbox full of bounced winsock mail that I gave up on. At this point it would probably be unwise to revisit re:blocking hook, re: error condition,etc. & friends :-) Larry From James=L.=Weaver@nectech.com Fri Oct 8 09:42:54 1993 Received: from nectech.com (milkyway.nectech.com) by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA24883; Fri, 8 Oct 93 09:42:54 EDT Received: from CS011.nectech.com by nectech.com with SMTP (5.65/29-nectech) id AA00820; Fri, 8 Oct 93 09:27:23 -0400 Return-Path: Message-Id: <9310081327.AA00820@nectech.com> Received: by CS011.nectech.com with VINES ; Fri, 8 Oct 93 09:40:39 EDT Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 09:40:35 EDT From: James=L.=Weaver@nectech.com Subject: RE: Checking on the return path To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Cc: I am on vacation until 10/18. Please contact Dick Dingler in an emergency. ------------- Original Text >From James=L.=Weaver@nectech.com, on 10-08-93 9:20: I am on vacation until 10/18. Please contact Dick Dingler in an emergency. ------------- Original Text >From backman@teflon.ftp.com (Larry Backman), on 10-08-93 6:13: >> Does this mean I don't have to be dirrectly subscribed to the list in order >> to reply to the list? If so this would definitely be great. >> and another original member of the list chimes in with a loud agreement. I have a mailbox full of bounced winsock mail that I gave up on. At this point it would probably be unwise to revisit re:blocking hook, re: error condition,etc. & friends :-) Larry From alun@huey.wst.com Wed Oct 13 16:19:53 1993 Received: from huey.wst.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA23275; Wed, 13 Oct 93 16:19:53 EDT Received: by huey.wst.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04923; Wed, 13 Oct 93 15:21:53 CDT From: alun@huey.wst.com (Alun Jones) Message-Id: <9310132021.AA04923@huey.wst.com> Subject: Announcing a new WFTPD version 1.3 for winsock. To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Date: Wed, 13 Oct 93 15:21:52 CDT X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Bowing to universal public demand, I have released a new version (1.3) of my Windows FTP daemon (in other words, server) application for winsock 1.1. This version now has security enabled, extra logging facilities and a lot more error checking. It can be fetched from huey.wst.com:/pub/winsock/wftpd/wftpd1_3.zip, or from microdyne.com, where it has been placed in the /pub/incoming directory, for future inclusion in the winsock/apps archives at microdyne and sunsite.unc.edu. There now follows the README: ===================================================================== Okay, for those of you that need an FTP server, but aren't too worried about how much it can actually do in the way of features, I present the third release of WFTPD - the Windows (winsock) FTP Daemon. Viewed as immediately necessary to add: More Error checking! Eventually, the program will contain the following features: Delete, Rename, Status, Help commands from clients supported. On-screen logging of transfers. Access controls to limit users' access. Anything else people find they want. ========================= This is 'version' 1.1 - it includes more error checking, a slightly faster transfer rate (but not by much), and a brief glimpse at how the interface will look when I add security and logging. Both these features currently do not work. Now, version 1.2 - this allows the changing of directories to work properly. I can't believe the amount of code I tried to write to do this, when it turned out that the standard calls handled all the cases I was interested in! The next version will have more error checking, in particular, it will ensure that it doesn't fill up the disk when doing a PUT, or a DIR. PWD and XPWD are now supported. A dialog will automatically warn you that this is the insecure version. Version 1.3 ::::::::::: This version is released with security in it, but a big fat hairy message goes out to anyone who logs in, telling them that you are too cheap to register. All logging to file is also implemented. Oh, and there's a little more error checking. ABOR now works, but the system doesn't seem to be able to stop a transfer reliably if it fills the disk up! Anonymous users are now allowed to log in (can be enabled/disabled from the security dialog), and have the same rights as other users - i.e. all. Passwords and other good information are stored in the WFTPD.INI file in the windows directory. From bruce@Bruces.frontiertech.com Fri Oct 15 17:13:18 1993 Received: from isi.FrontierTech.COM by SunSITE.unc.edu (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA19860; Fri, 15 Oct 93 17:13:18 EDT Received: from bruces.FrontierTech.COM by isi.FrontierTech.COM (5.65/1.40) id AA12705; Fri, 15 Oct 93 16:14:27 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 93 15:06:47 DST From: bruce@Bruces.frontiertech.com Subject: Re: Frontier NFS client and Workgroups - HELP! To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Reply-To: Tcp@isi.FrontierTech.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII jimw@pe-nelson.com (Jim Watt) writes: >I've been struggling to get Frontier's NFS client to work under Windows >for Workgroups for about a week. Frontier doesn't support this configuration >yet, but they claim it's been done, and sent me a snippet of a WfWG 3.11 The first release of Windows for Worgroups does not work and play well with others. Our upcoming VxD-based TCP/IP and NFS, currently in beta test, will be able to work around the problems in Windows for Workgroups. **************************************** Bruce Backman (Bruce@FrontierTech.com) Frontier Technologies Corporation 10201 N. Port Washington Road Mequon, WI 53092 ****************************************