From martin@ndl.co.uk Thu Jan 20 13:28:40 1994 Received: from relay1.pipex.net by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.06) with SMTP id AA06053; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 08:29:16 -0500 Received: from jalfrezi.ndl.co.uk by relay1.pipex.net with SMTP (PP) id <13318-0@relay1.pipex.net>; Thu, 20 Jan 1994 13:28:59 +0000 Received: by jalfrezi.ndl.co.uk (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16742; Thu, 20 Jan 94 13:28:40 GMT Date: Thu, 20 Jan 94 13:28:40 GMT From: martin@ndl.co.uk (Martin J. Norman) Message-Id: <9401201328.AA16742@jalfrezi.ndl.co.uk> To: winsock-users@sunsite.unc.edu Subject: Re: winsock for novell Cc: winsock-hackers@sunsite.unc.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >content-type:text/plain;charset=us-ascii >mime-version:1.0 > > > >> >Could somone mail me some information on how to get >> >Winsock 1.1 DLL for Novell Netware. Is it free? or >> >something you have to order from novell? >> > > >> >> >> Its comes with Windows/NT when NWLink is installed. >> >> > > Is there any way to get it without using/obtaining Windows/NT?? > What if I want to develop a winsock app which runs under > Windows 3.1 with Novell??? > > - Ted Larson > HP Corporate Network Services > Client/Server Tools Group > ted@corp.hp.com > > Not that I am aware of, but Microsoft way know for sure. Microsoft seem not to want to comment to much on the subject, when I ask microsoft UK about it they say don't know. I have also noticed that the NWLink samples that come with the C 7.0 NT-SDK do not appear in the samples with VC++ for NT. If some one from Microsoft reads this mail try making a comment!! You could also try to provide documentation both for users and developers!! Martin Norman Network Designers Ltd. Systems Development Group. martin@ndl.co.uk From bruce@Bruces.FrontierTech.COM Fri Jan 28 03:06:36 1994 Received: from isi.FrontierTech.COM by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.06) with SMTP id AA17135; Fri, 28 Jan 1994 10:02:20 -0500 Received: from bruces.FrontierTech.COM by isi.FrontierTech.COM (5.65/1.40) id AA01998; Fri, 28 Jan 94 08:58:06 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 94 09:06:36 CST From: bruce@Bruces.FrontierTech.COM Subject: Buffers > 32K in Winsock? To: winsock-hackers@sunsite.unc.edu Reply-To: Bruce@isi.FrontierTech.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII I remember the issue of large buffers coming up a while back, but I don't remember if any consensus was expressed. Does a Winsock implementation have to check for segment wraparound, or is it up to the application to make sure that won't happen? **************************************** Bruce A Backman (Bruce@FrontierTech.COM) Frontier Technologies Corporation 10201 North Port Washington Road Mequon, WI 53092 **************************************** From bruce@Bruces.FrontierTech.COM Fri Jan 28 03:16:14 1994 Received: from isi.FrontierTech.COM by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.06) with SMTP id AA18287; Fri, 28 Jan 1994 10:11:52 -0500 Received: from bruces.FrontierTech.COM by isi.FrontierTech.COM (5.65/1.40) id AA02015; Fri, 28 Jan 94 09:07:43 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 94 09:16:14 CST From: bruce@Bruces.FrontierTech.COM Subject: oops, 64K (Re: Buffers > 32K in Winsock?) To: winsock-hackers@sunsite.unc.edu Reply-To: Bruce@isi.FrontierTech.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Sorry, I mistyped the subject in my previous message. I meant 64K. >I remember the issue of large buffers coming up a while >back, but I don't remember if any consensus was expressed. >Does a Winsock implementation have to check for segment >wraparound, or is it up to the application to make sure >that won't happen? > >**************************************** >Bruce A Backman (Bruce@FrontierTech.COM) >Frontier Technologies Corporation >10201 North Port Washington Road >Mequon, WI 53092 >**************************************** **************************************** Bruce A Backman (Bruce@FrontierTech.COM) Frontier Technologies Corporation 10201 North Port Washington Road Mequon, WI 53092 ****************************************