head     1.1;
branch   1.1.1;
access   ;
symbols  start:1.1.1.1 markom:1.1.1;
locks    ; strict;
comment  @# @;


1.1
date     2002.01.16.10.25.01;  author markom;  state Exp;
branches 1.1.1.1;
next     ;

1.1.1.1
date     2002.01.16.10.25.01;  author markom;  state Exp;
branches ;
next     ;


desc
@@



1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@From rms@@gnu.org Thu Jul 22 20:37:55 1999
Flags: 10
Return-Path: rms@@gnu.org
Received: from arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu (root@@arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.215]) by odin.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.6+cwru/CWRU-2.4-ins)
	id UAA25349; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:54 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@@gnu.org for <chet@@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu>)
Received: from nike.ins.cwru.edu (root@@nike.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.219]) by arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.6)
	id UAA05311; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:51 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@@gnu.org for <chet@@po.cwru.edu>)
Received: from pele.santafe.edu (pele.santafe.edu [192.12.12.119]) by nike.ins.cwru.edu with ESMTP (8.8.7/CWRU-2.5-bsdi)
	id UAA13350; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:50 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@@gnu.org for <chet@@nike.ins.cwru.edu>)
Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10831
	for <chet@@nike.ins.cwru.edu>; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from rms@@localhost)
	by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id SAA01089;
	Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199907230037.SAA01089@@wijiji.santafe.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@@gnu.org using -f
From: Richard Stallman <rms@@gnu.org>
To: chet@@nike.ins.cwru.edu
Subject: Use of Readline
Reply-to: rms@@gnu.org

I think Allbery's suggestion is a good one.  So please add this text
in a suitable place.  Please don't put it in the GPL itself; that
should be the same as the GPL everywhere else.  Putting it in the
README and/or the documentation would be a good idea.


======================================================================
Our position on the use of Readline through a shared-library linking
mechanism is that there is no legal difference between shared-library
linking and static linking--either kind of linking combines various
modules into a single larger work.  The conditions for using Readline
in a larger work are stated in section 3 of the GNU GPL.


@


1.1.1.1
log
@Insight
@
text
@@