From: José Luis Gómez Dans (j.l.gomez-dans@sheffield.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 01 2000 - 13:57:43 CET
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:39:35PM +0100, Marko Djukic wrote:
> although critics just for the sake of criticising better beware of
> muLynch mobs knocking their doors down in the middle of the night... ;)
:)
> > Some people writes me privately, telling the FAQ is a very bad work;
> > that it is un-usable, un-understandable, etc.
> >
> > Every old subscriber to this list know the reluctance I started
> > the FAQ, but to see how much it is considered counterproductive, it
> > is a little surprising.
> >
> > So I ask now for your opinions: does it is better to remove the FAQ
> > at all, from the site? Or is it amendable?
[To answer Michele's original message] I find that the FAQ is
quite useful, and that it keeps with the whole mulinux concept. But if
people have problems with it, why don't they just post their
suggestions?
Jose
-- José L Gómez Dans PhD student Tel: +44 114 222 5582 Radar & Communications Group FAX; +44 870 132 2990 Department of Electronic Engineering University of Sheffield UK --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:17 CET