From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 10:01:25 CEST
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Dumas Patrice nicely wrote:
>
> The first thing to do in respect with this objective, I
> think, is to define a way to store the different interfaces so that muLinux
> could automatically detect the interfaces which are defined and the
> masquerading could be centrally-defined.
>
The values for the interface X can be stored in X.cnf, without problem.
X.fun call netconfig to start/stop. In netconfig we put a
case $INTERFACE in
eth*)
ppp*)
plip)*
esac
to handle different methods.
Maybe, the good solution is to introduce a routing.fun and setup/routing,
able to handle the packets patch between interfaces, if the case.
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET