[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [oc] Processor Instruction reply for Andreas
Martin
It was, but more work in parallel not sequential ;-)
Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cores@opencores.org [mailto:owner-cores@opencores.org]On
> Behalf Of Martin.J Thompson
> Sent: 12 December 2001 08:28
> To: cores@opencores.org
> Subject: RE: [oc] Processor Instruction reply for Andreas
>
>
> >Martin,
> >
> >False teeth then?
> >
> >None of the instructions slow the clock, thats the primary priority
> >natürlich.
> >
>
> But that's not always possible - I thought you were saying you would just keep doingm ore and more work per clock tick
> without owrrying about the length of a tick... sorry!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml